Why I won’t be voting for the lone environmentalist in the presidentiables list, and other Presidential Debate musings

At today’s Inquirer Presidential Debate at University of the Philippines (UP) Diliman, two candidates caught my attention in terms of their environmental views.

First was Nicky Perlas, whom I realized would make a good DENR (Department of Environment and Natural Resources) Secretary, but not a president–well, not yet at least. See, he had clearcut answers about environment and  health  issues during the debate; but had farfetched answers on questions related to actual governance and politics. This made me unsure of his capactiy to lead a country.

I agreed with him when he said that environmental protection goes hand in hand with development. Although the time limit of the debate did not allow him to elaborate, I knew where he was coming from, especially after having read Vandana Shiva’s “Staying Alive” and David Korten’s “People Centered Development”. 

Which leads me to the second candidate whose environmental view interested me: Gibo Teodoro, who no doubt was an eloquent and astute speaker, but whose view on “sustainable mining” disturbed me. For him, sustainable mining meant that mining is permissible and acceptable as long as locals agree with it. For him, it’s just a matter of getting the ‘yes’ of locals before exploiting natural resources.

The important question to ask, though, is the WHY. That is, to determine the REASON why locals would agree to mining–to the exploitation and degradation of their land. First and foremost would be for sheer survival. In poor provinces, people permit the exploitation of their resources because of poverty and the need to feed themselves and their families. The less fortunate do not have time to contemplate the intellectual aspects of environmental destruction. Due to their hand-to-mouth existence, their concern usually is where to get their next meal. Therefore, their saying ‘YES’ to an ill-defined “sustainable mining” would stem from THE FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL and not an intellectually-charged rationale for agreement.

Needless to say, this was the question that made me eliminate Gibo Teodoro from my list of people to consider as president.

I would have wanted to vote for Nicky Perlas for his apparent sincerity and his mastery of environment and health issues, which are two of my three must-do’s (aside from education), but it is to early to entrust the whole Philippines to someone who needs more experience in governance.

In my head, I’ve also eliminated Erap Estrada (For obvious reasons–Duh!), Manny Villar (Trapo!), Jamby Madrigal (Drama Queen!), and Eddie Villanueva, who kept on harping about “moral leadership”, but who fell short on CONCRETE STEPS on how to go about it.

I was surprised to see some eloquence in Noynoy Aquino. I was amazed to hear him speak fluent and beautiful-sounding Filipino. And more importantly, his answers made sense! True, he was pretty low-profile as senator, but I’ll see how he morphs into an able presidentiable in the coming months.

I understand it’s too much to ask for presidentiables to be tree-huggers, but I hope they’ll put the environment in their platform too.  Because even before this circus of an election season came to be, climate change has arrived. It’s here. And 92 million lives are at stake.


4 comments on “Why I won’t be voting for the lone environmentalist in the presidentiables list, and other Presidential Debate musings

  1. mich! blog mo ba to? just a few comments:-)
    perlas: perlas was among my choices before. i have to agree that he would make an excellent denr secretary. president–not yet. though sayang. at the debate in miriam college last sunday, i felt that…well, his answers needed more weight. Or something like that. So, sad to say, my vote is not going to him anymore.

    gibo: he was a distant third from my choices. but with his views on mining being okay as long as locals allow it..i’ll have to say pass. environment is one of the major issues that we have to take seriously. di enough ngo’s na lang palagi. so because of what you’ve shared, i’m not going to consider him anymore.

    kaya alam ko na sino boboto ko!
    –this is louella, btw:-)

    • Hi Louella!

      Yeah, this is my blog. =) Nice to see you here! I’ll link your blog to mine, okay? =)

      Sayang talaga si Perlas. He’s the only candidate who understands environment and health issues deeply. But it’s too early for him to be president. Oh well. Right place, wrong time.

  2. Hey Mitzie! Found your blog via Twitter. 🙂

    Great, great points. 🙂 So, NoyNoy ka na? Hehehe! Buti ka pa, may iboboto na. Hahaha

    • Hi Mitch!

      I’m not sure about Noynoy either. Will still have to think about it. There’s this one thing that’s stopping me: KRIS AQUINO! Hahaha. =)

      I was surprised to see for myself what kind of intelligence Noynoy has during the Debate, though. This, plus his being articulate. He’s been so low-profile the past years; it’s only now that I’m learning more about him.

      Will link you up in my blog. =)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s